Aroma-Medicine is Growing Strong: Debunking the Critiques of Aromatherapy
 |
Aromatherapy in the United States really suffers from an image problem, and a few degreed ‘debunkers’ are not really helping the matter. Googling ‘aromatherapy’ returns thousands of results, and in the top 15 are sites belonging to allopathic medical professionals who seem to only have given a cursory glance at the practice, and chalked it up to New Age, feel-good balderdash. Horse manure. Bull -hockey. The trouble with their analysis is that they’re based on a very limited investigation, lumping all of aroma medicine in with every claim about the ‘softer science’ of psycho-emotional aromatherapy healing. The result is that many folks whom may benefit from aroma medicine may not get it, and many physicians investigating alternative medicine modalities may overlook the true potentials of essential oils. What can be done to change aromatherapy’s touchy-feely image?
How about we’ll start be agreeing on this: That SOME of aromatherapy is in-fact a ‘soft science’? That SOME people may feel more relaxed when inhaling Lavender, for example, and some will not? Aromatherapists will not disagree on this point — they will however put up a defense when the medical applications of essential oils are thrown out with the soft side of ‘aroma’ therapy. Science IS BACKING UP many of aromatherapy’s claims with valid data, even on the ‘soft-science’ of the practice. Here’s a look at the science behind aromatherapy, the holes in arguments of the popular debunkers, and why aroma-medicine has it’s place in today’s medical practices.
The image problem of aromatherapy has everything to do with the prevailing idea that the practice is all about ‘smelling things’, whereas the science really about ‘things that smell’. Smelling things is very subjective, and may have little medical effect at all (though we’ll see that it MAY as well). Aromatherapy is defined as the complete practice of the branch of natural medicine using the volatile liquids distilled from plants. Authors of the hard-science aromatherapy texts available today, professionally-trained aromatherapists (one with a PhD in Chemistry) note that the future of aroma medicine is with the treatment of serious infectious illnesses and cancer treatment. You don’t even have to smell them for them to work! Other effects of essential oils also being successfully investigated include speeding wound healing, reducing inflammation, and acting as analgesics.
You can read these research abstracts yourself by Googling ‘Pub Med’, and searching for ‘essential oil’ and things like ‘cancer’ or ‘staphylococcus’ or ‘axiolytic’. You’ll find a few studies too that were inconclusive, like inhalation of a certain oil did not change the immune system stress marker researchers use. But there’s also another showing that EVERY OTHER marker of stress WAS changed. It may be the study chose the right oil, or the study population was better treated with the selected oil in some studies and not in others (one showed a stress reduction in women from lavender essential oil, but not in men). You’ll find a full page of results showing a statistically significant effect on stress from lavender and linalool. Try other combinations of pharmaceutical preparations and see if there are more significant results than that!
So aromatherapists will even cede that there’s mix results. While the naysayers use this data to say “aromatherapy doesn’t work”, the reasonable statement seems to be: “everyone’s different. Some people respond and some don’t. It may be that they would respond to a different aromatic, or maybe not at all”. From Robert T. Carol of skepdic.com: “…I have to conclude that aromatherapy is a mostly a pseudoscientific alternative medical therapy. It is a mixture of folklore, trial and error, anecdote, testimonial, New Age spiritualism and fantasy.” Stephen Barrett, M.D. of Quackwatch doesn’t really seem to make a point about essential oils, but to just sound disgruntled about the whole idea. Sure, there may be some unsubstantiated claims floating about, but let’s play fair. How many deadly drugs have been pulled from the market after drug-manufacturer-paid rigorous scientific investigations claimed them to be “safe and effective”? One chart puts deaths attributed to “properly prescribed and used drugs” between those from alcohol and those from alcohol — these just above “preventable medical” misshap, and all of these above traffic fatalities. How many died from using essential oils? Can you draw a circle? How about the letter that comes between ‘n’ and ‘p’?
On to the cutting edge of aroma-medicine: The big news is that essential oils, yes very the same used in aromatherapy (this IS the idea we’re trying to get across!), are highly effective antibiotics and antivirals. Again, we invite you to search for ‘essential oil’ and ‘mrsa’ — this is the staphylococcus aureus bacteria ‘superbug’ that has become resistant to commonly available antibiotics (the MR in the name stands for ‘methicillin resistant’). You’ll find studies showing the efficacy of Tea Tree essential oil in clinical applications, and positive results in the lab using several other oils. And thus far it is thought that these oils have no adverse effects at effective doses.
Then there’s the myriad of studies showing essential oils’ efficacy in destroying cancers. A recent study in the journal of “Chemico-Biological Interactions” noted that linalool, a common essential oil constituent, completely eradicated a particular liver cancer cell line at very, very small concentrations. Try ‘essential oil’ and ‘cancer’ in Pub Med and you’ll get results like “Frankincense oil derived from Boswellia carteri induces tumor cell specific cytotoxicity”(perhaps this is terminology of “New Age spiritualism” I’m yet unaware of). Another result is “Anticancer activity of an essential oil from Cymbopogon flexuosus” (Lemongrass essential oil) with a conclusion of “Our results indicate that the oil has a promising anticancer activity and causes loss in tumor cell viability by activating the apoptotic process as identified by electron microscopy.” The list, of course, goes on (there are in fact 388 results today for this search).
So why are these criticisms of aromatherapy so popular, at least in Google’s eyes? Why do some folks like horror flicks and car crashes — not sure, really. It might have to do with there being a closer relationship between ‘aromatherapy’ and ‘Glade Plug-in Air Freshener (TM)’ in many people’s minds than there is between ‘aromatherapy’ ‘frankincense’ and ‘tumor cell specific cytotoxicity’. One reality is that there’s a lot more money pushing the Glad Plug-In concept. Because essential oils cannot be patented as medicines, the amount of money to be made by Really Big Business is negligible. So it’s up to small natural health companies, individual practitioners, and the wonderful education and research facilities doing the technical work to get the word out. And particularly to rock the boat a bit when so-called authorities make truly dubious claims about the dubious nature of aromatherapy. Plant medicine has kept human beings alive for millennia — essential oils are just very active molecules produced by plants, and aromatherapy is so-called as it deals with the therapeutic applications of these aromatic molecules. Aroma-therapy. Get the word out!
The author has made available much information about aromatherapy, such as using lime and other aromatherapy oils.
Health (1-year auto-renewal)Get fresh ideas and inspiration on how to make the healthy life truly irresistible. Health covers its readers' many interests, including cutting-edge ... Read more...
Mederma Skin Care for Scars, 1.76 oz (50 g)Formulated with Cepalin Botanical Extract. From the leader in scar management. No. 1 doctor & pharmacist recommended product for scars. Greaseless gel... Read more...
Related Videos:
Chose Crocs As Your Summer Shoe
Meditation with the Help of Brainwave Entrainment
Aromatherapy Feed
What do you think about this write-up?